Tagebuch 38;2009 englisch

Diary 38
2009     

 

On 23 July 2009

08:48 Clock

 

The straight line is a curved one-dimensional space onto a two dimensional spherical surface.

The two-dimensional spherical surface is a curved three-dimensional space on a ball.

Text Counter

The three-dimensional sphere is a curved space in a four-dimensional ball.

The four-dimensional sphere is a curved space in a five-dimensional sphere.

The k-dimensional sphere is a curved space in a k +1. dimensional ball.

 

All this is true for a ball.

But not in a cube.

 

That's just a straight one-dimensional space on a two-dimensional square.

The square is a flat two-dimensional space on a three-dimensional cube.

The three-dimensional cube is a flat space in a four-dimensional cube.

The four-dimensional cube is a flat five-dimensional cube in a cube.

The k-dimensional cube is a cube plane in a k +1. dimensional cube.

 

One question remains:

How many dimensions is the Internet?

Zeroth dimension and first dimension.

The Internet is a surface. Only you do not know whether she is curved.

 

The quantum computer would have a six-dimensional space. And nobody knows if they are curved.

 

And another thing:

In a four-dimensional space, there must be four-dimensional beings, too.

In a five-dimensional space five-dimensional creatures, etc.

 

On 24 July 2009

11:07 Clock

 

Nothing we can recognize from the big bang and seen nothing outside of our universe.

Nothing we can recognize in the creation and recognize nothing outside of creation.

What was before and what is outside, there can only speculate.

Anyone can let your creativity run wild.

 

For physics:

Wave-particles are only auxiliary constructions of the scientists who have nothing to do with reality.

 

On 31 July 2009

10:50 Clock

 

To mathematics:

Axioms are unprovable assumptions.

Sets are proved in mathematics with the help of axioms.

So is proved with the help of some unverifiable? Is not that a contradiction?

 

Mathematicians speak of evidence.
 Physicists speak of evidence.
 Scientists speak of evidence.
They all eventually go out of unprovable assumptions.
I can prove nothing.
 My whole philosophy is one unprovable assumption.
It is certainly not wrong. But as I said: Every system is incomplete after Gödel.